Winning for Rochdale with Nick Clegg's record breaking Lib Dems

"On May 1st, you chose another 2 years under the Liberal Democrats! Labour had their worst result EVER and nearly came a disastrous 3rd behind the Conservatives!"

Rochdale Borough Liberal Democrats

Rush defiant despite criticism of conduct!

10.46.31pm BST (GMT +0100) Tue 1st Aug 2006

Councillor Peter Rush, elected to Rochdale Borough Council in May has apologised for 'sticking two fingers up' at the Conservative and Labour Councillors at a Full Council Meeting.

Peter said, "I regret that I did it in a Full Council Meeting, and I do regret that it happened on such a 'dignified occasion'. My fight is for the people of Heywood, unfortunately the Labour Party are not used to opposition and the last few months I have had to put up with petty bullying and intimidation from Labour, not willing to accept the decision of the Electorate. Readers of this paper will know exactly what I mean - I will not be diverted from my main aim which is to put the people of Heywood first. On a positive note at my first full, functioning Council Meeting I raised many issues that affect people from Heywood. This includes the escalation in crime, the opening hours of the Police Station, the destruction of the cherry trees on Starkey Street and my key policy of 'Home Rule for Heywood. This was in direct contrast to the situation before I was elected - where Heywood was lucky to even merit a mention outside of the Township Report."

Bookmark this story at: del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg FacebookFacebook redditreddit StumbleUponStumbleUpon
Print this news story.
Comment on this news story.
Previous news story: Paul Rowen MP congratulates Infirmary staff! (Tue 1st Aug 2006).
Next news story: Council votes to support Bus-re-regulation! - Mulgrew (Tue 1st Aug 2006).

Printed and hosted by Prater Raines Ltd, 82b Sandgate High Street, Folkestone CT20 3BX.
Published and Promoted by Adam Power on behalf of Rochdale Liberal Democrats, all at 144, Drake Strett, Rochdale, OL16 1PS
The views expressed are those of the party, not of the service provider.